INTRODUCTION
This essay brings to an end the
debate between those who believe that the message
according to the gospel can be reconciled with
science, and those who believe that science and
the gospel are contradictory. Any debate implies
uncertainty, when a debate therefore comes to an
end, so does the uncertainty that generates the
debate. Modern science and the message according
to the gospel are irreconcilable. Henceforth I
will refer to deluded
man as natural man,
and to transformed
man, as spiritual
man.
MESSAGE
ACCORDING TO THE GOSPEL
The message according to the
gospel is clear. Unless natural man is born again,
unless his rationality is restored, he remains
deluded. Spiritual man is natural man resurrected.
Man comes into this world with an intact mind, the
new born baby is a spiritual being. Soon after
birth the infant dies spiritually, his mind is
deluded, corrupted, he falls from grace and
becomes a natural person. Unless he is resurrected
he will remain spiritually dead.
This is the message according to the
gospel.
TRANSFORMATION
The transition from natural man
to spiritual man is referred to as transformation
or conversion. Transformation is the restoration
of reason to the irrational mindset. The process
of transformation has two elements; confession and
restoration. The minute natural man confesses in
faith that he is deluded, the door is opened for
transformation. It is important to know that
confession and faith go hand in hand. Natural man
cannot know that he is deluded, that he lives in a
fantasy world, if he knew, it would mean that he
is not deluded. Restoration is a very painful in
the sense that unless we die to our fantasy world,
it is not possible for us to be "born again", to
become spiritual beings. Confession therefore
leads to conversion, the restoration of reason.
FAITH OR DESPERATION
Transformation can come about the easy way,
through faith, or the difficult way, out of
desperation. It seems that most transformations
take place in desperation. The individual is
down and out, in the gutter, only then does he
"give up", and acknowledges that his whole life
is a sham. On the other hand if a person accepts
in faith that his mind is corrupted, it opens
the door, without him having to go through all
the suffering that brings him to the gutter. The
main stumbling block for natural man is pride,
most individuals are too prideful to accept in
faith that they are deluded.
THE WORLD WE LIVE
IN
The present world we live in is
a product of natural man, irrational man. It
means that all the so called knowledge that
we have gathered from the beginning of
'civilization', is falsified information.
This means that our present world, is a
pseudo world, removed from the real world.
This is the reason why the world is in such
a mess. Everything that is wrong with this
present world is a product of natural man.
The house we have built has no foundation,
it is standing on sand, it is now
collapsing, whether we believe it or not.
THE END OF SECRECY
We have now reached a point
in time where it has become necessary to
re-publish information which has been
systematically withdrawn and ignored in
the past. Information that has been
censored by natural man. Publications such
as: Herbert Dingle's, "Science at the
crossroads"; Morris Kline's, "Mathematics:
The loss of certainty"; George Berkley's
"The analyst"; George Orwell's novel,
"1984"; Ayan Rand's novel, "Atlas
Shrugged", to mention only a few. We have
reached the end of a crooked line, there
can be no more secrecy about matters that
affect each and every individual on earth.
Reality is not debatable. Natural man is
at the"crossroad's", he has had his
day, his time is up.
WHY THE WORLD
HAS SURVIVED TILL NOW
It is difficult to
imagine the extent of the damage done by
natural man. We will examine the process
of falsification, however before we do
that, we need to see why the bogus
information system has survived for so
long. Because natural man is deluded, the
world as he knows it is an extension of
himself. Natural man's identity is
reflected in his world. By protecting his
imaginary world, he protects his false
identity. The two systems that has worked
together to maintain the bogus world
system, is education, and mass
communication. Education is the process
whereby the delusion is reinforced during
the formal years, and mass communication
is the process by which the delusion is
maintained in adulthood.
THE INFORMATION HIGHWAY
The advent of the
Internet, ushered in the the demise of
the dissemination of false
information. The information highway
has brought an end to censorship.
Censorship is the process which
prevents wisdom from reaching the
masses. The personal computer together
with the INTERNET have opened the
floodgates of uncensored information.
For the first time in the history of
mankind, freedom of information is a
reality. Not so long ago this message
would have been prevented from
reaching your eyes. No longer is it
possible for natural man to protect
his false identity, the information
highway has opened the door for the
unscrupulous dissemination of the
truth.
BIRTH OF
THE NEW DISPENSATION
The end of
secrecy has opened the door that
will bring about the collective
transformation of the corrupt world
system. The coming new dispensation
is going to differ radically from
what we have today. Everything is
going to be made new. The rational
mindset, is going to replace the
irrational mindset, as the dominant
mindset. Spiritual man is going to
bring about the healing of the
nations, a total transformation of
the world system. Unfortunately it
seems that we will have to go
through a major world crisis to
bring about the change, natural man
will resist change with all the
power that he has at his disposal.
PROTECTING THE SYSTEM
The falsification of
reality is an on going process that
dates back to the beginning of
history. Through the ages a small
number of spiritual individuals
attempted to expose the superficial
system, however at the time, it was
all in vain. Natural man was able to
suppress all information that
threatened the system. It is
important to know that there is no
need for natural man to
conspire(organize) resistance to
change. Natural man acts in his own
self interest when he defends the
system. He is protecting his own
identity. Natural man cannot
separate himself from that which he
has fabricated. By protecting the
system he is protecting himself.
THE PROCESS OF
FALSIFICATION
We will now examine a
number of instances of
falsification, so that we can
clearly see how natural man has
fabricated his own imaginary world.
Science is the process whereby man
studies his environment and
systematically explains that which
he observes. Because natural man is
deluded, it follows that the results
of his scientific endeavors will
have to be at variance with reality.
In other words his explanations
(theories) are false. These
falsehoods are reinforced by the
education system, maintained by the
media, and protected by natural man.
What we have is a viscous circle
that is perpetuated from generation
to generation.
PYTHAGORAS
From
time to time a spiritual man makes
his mark on history. One such a
person was Pythagoras of Samos
(582-500 BC). Pythagoras believed
that the universe is structured in
an orderly manner and that it is
possible for man to comprehend the
nature of things. He believed that
there is a rational explanation
for everything, and that there is
no place for irrationality in a
harmonious world. "Pythagoras,
however, is generally credited
with the theory of the functional
significance of numbers in the
objective world, and in
music"(EB).
THE PYTHAGOREAN THEOREM
Unfortunately
none of Pythagoras' original
writings survived. " It is
difficult to distinguish
Pythagoras' teachings from those
of his disciples. None of his
writings has survived, and
Pythagoreans invariably
supported their doctrines by
indiscriminately citing their
master's authority "(EB). Had
Pythagoras been alive today he
would scoff at those who
proclaim the existence of
irrationals by using the idea
of incommensurability as an excuse.
The idea of incommensurability
is a myth dating back to
Hippasus (450 BC). To this day
the idea of incommensurability
is still accepted by natural man
as a reality.
THE MYTH OF
INCOMMENSURABILITY
Incommensurability
is
the idea that when using a ruler
(measuring stick), there will be
certain extensions within the
scope of the ruler, which will
not be measurable. The reason
given for this is that certain
extensions will fall in between
the markings on the ruler, ie.
there are gaps(holes) along the
extension. This is a classical
example of natural man's
delusion. Because natural man's
perception of reality is
distorted he 'measures' by
focusing on non-extension (the
markings on the ruler) instead
of using the extension of the
ruler as a standard.
THE
STANDARD OF MEASUREMENT
In reality
the standard of measurement is
extension, the
means by which we measure is
the ruler. The accuracy of
measurement will be dependent
on the number of divisions on
the ruler. The more divisions
there are the more
precise(accurate) will the
measurement be. Using a ruler
with a three hundred
millimeter division, it is
possible to measure any
extension between one and
three hundred millimeters,
within an accuracy of one
millimeter. There is no
extension between one
and three hundred millimeters
that is incommensurable with
the given ruler.
ZENO OF ELEA
One of the first
historical figures to
demonstrate that there is
something amiss with
natural man mental
process, was Zeno of Elea
(495-430 BC). Zeno was a
student of Parmenides.
Parmenides rejected the
idea of plurality(duality)
and believed that "all is
one". Zeno proposed four
different paradoxes in
defense of his master.
Zeno's second paradox is
known as " Archilles and
the Tortoise ". This
paradox clearly shows how
the deluded mind of
natural man works.
ACHILLES AND THE
TORTOISE
The paradox is
stated as follows: A race
is run with two
contenders, Achilles the
hare, and the tortoise.
The tortoise is given a
head start in order to
level the playing field.
The race is started and in
the time it takes the hare
to get to the position
where the tortoise was at
the start, the tortoise
would have moved forward
some distance. This is
repeated, and the outcome
is that the hare cannot
catch the tortoise. We
know that the hare will
pass the tortoise and
therefore we know that
there is an error in the
basic premise, and
consequently in the
subsequent reasoning.
Natural man looks
at the above statement and
comes to the following
conclusion: " But the
baffling thing is,
although it is
contradicted by the
commonest actions in
everybody's life, Zeno's
point is logically
unassailable. There is no
technical flaw in his
reasoning." The truth is
that there is a complete
lack of logic
in the statement, and
because the statement is
based on a false premise,
it has to lead to a false
conclusion. According to
natural man, the problem
can only be resolved by
the use of the calculus.
(ie. a false premise
corrective mechanism)
THE DELUDED MIND
The mind of
natural man nullifies
the head start and
consequently introduces
a false premise. The
false premise is this :
'in the time it takes
the hare to get to the
position where the
tortoise was at the
start of the race.... '.
The hare is
already at the
position where the
tortoise was before
the head start was
given. We
cannot just
eliminate(nullify) the
head start from the
equation and expect to
solve the problem. The
moment that the race
starts, the hare begins
to deplete the head
start. Soon as the head
start is depleted the
hare will pass the
tortoise. The final
result will be
determined by the length
of the track, the head
start, and the the
respective velocities of
the hare and the
tortoise.
THEN AND NOW
Has anything
changed since Zeno ?
The system of then, is
no different than the
system of now. The
system has not
changed, and
consequently the
blunders continue.
There has been great
technological progress
in the last century,
and yet the underlying
theories are false.
Natural man has
visited the moon, and
to top it off, man
launched an out of
focus telescope into
earth orbit. What is
the connection between
landing a man on the
moon, and constructing
an out of focus
telescope ? The
connection is this; on
landing a man on the
moon, the scientists
relied on a error
correcting feedback
system to reach their
destination, and in
building the
telescope, man relied
on science, without
incorporating an error
correcting feedback
system, to shape the
telescope lens.
Consequently the lens
was flawed.
RECENT
BLUNDERS
We will now
go back a hundred
years and examine
some major blunders
in the field of
science. The first
blunder came at the
turn of the previous
century, the
introduction of the
special and general
theories of
relativity. This was
soon to be followed
by the theory of the
so-called 'quantum
mechanics', and more
recently the fallacy
of the so-called
'big bang', the
rationalization for
the origin of the
universe. Natural
man cannot learn
from his mistakes,
he can only repeat
them. Until such
time as natural
man's reason is
restored, he will
continue fabricating
false theories, to
correct his false
premises.
ALBERT
EINSTEIN
In his book
entitled: "
RELATIVITY: The
special and general
theory ", Einstein
takes an example of
a man dropping a
stone from a moving
train. Two people
observe the event,
one person observes
the event from the
embankment, and the
other person, the
one who drops the
stone, from the
carriage. Now
according to
Einstein, and I
quote him word for
word:
'The stone
traverses a
straight line
relative to a
system of
co-ordinates
rigidly attached
to the carriage,
but relative to
a system of
co-ordinates
attached to the
ground
(embankment) it
describes a
parabola. With
the aid of this
example it is
clearly seen
that there is no
such thing as an
independently
existing
trajectory
(lit."
path-curve ")
but only a
trajectory
relative to a
particular body
of reference.'
The reality is
that both
observers are in
the same(real)
world, and that
both observers
will plot the
same path for
the falling
stone. The stone
follows an
independent
existing
trajectory,
describing a
parabola,
regardless of
the particular
body of
reference. This
is what happens
in the real
world, and what
happens in the
real world, is
what real
science is all
about.
SPECIAL
RELATIVITY
Because
of
Einstein's
distorted
perception of
reality, he
comes to the
conclusion
that the same
stone can
follow two
paths. In
order for his
observation to
conform with
reality, he
had no choice
but to
formulate a
false theory
to correct his
false premise.
Einstein
commits the
unpardonable
sin of
nullifying the
'moving
earth'.
According to
him the
movement of
the stone is
relative to
the stationary
earth and
moving train,
or, to
the stationary
train and
moving earth.
This seems
strange,
however, even
if we accept
this premise,
why does he
then disregard
the 'moving'
earth when the
carriage is
the frame of
reference?
Surely if the
man on the
embankment
plots the path
of the stone
on his
co-ordinate
system, the
path will be
the same path
that the man
in the
carriage plots
on his
co-ordinate
system. When
the man in the
carriage let's
go of the
stone, the
stone is earth
bound and it
'moves' to the
earth,
independent of
the carriage.
The
special theory
of relativity
leads to all
kinds of
irrational
conclusions.
In his book
"Science at
the
Crossroad's"
Herbert Dingle
outlined the
impossibility
of two clocks,
both running
slower than
each other.
One of the
many false
conclusions
derived from
the special
theory of
relativity.
QUANTUM
MECHANICS
The
second major
blunder that
followed the
fabrication of
special
relativity is
the idea of
quantum
mechanics.
There can be
no better
example than
quantum
mechanics to
illustrate the
irrationality
of natural
man. The idea
that gave
birth to
quantum
mechanics is
the so-called
twin slit
experiment.
There is no
need to go
into the
details of the
experiment,
all we need to
do to expose
the chaos, is
to examine the
components
which make up
the
experiment,
and the
resulting
conclusion.
The duality of
the natural
mindset is
clearly seen
in this
'experiment'.
The
experiment
consists of
the following:
a source; a
particle and a
non-particle(wave),
a restriction;
a barrier and
a
non-barrier(slit
in the
barrier), an
observer and a
non-observer(somebody
that is not
looking i.e. a
ghost) The
conclusions
drawn from
this
'experiment'
is that chaos
prevails,
which should
not be
surprising,
the duality is
clear.
Supposedly the
two-slit
experiment
shows that at
the sub atomic
level, the
rules of
nature (cause
and effect) is
replaced by
randomness(non
cause and
effect). The
innocent
reader may see
this as a
joke, I can
assure him
this is modern
science.
THE
HARVEST IS
RIPE
And
so a debate
comes to an
abrupt end.
The harvest is
ripe, the time
has come for
the CURSE to be removed. The Kingdom of God is
established.
This world is
judged, the
time has come
for reason to
be restored.
Natural man
has had his
day, his house
is built on
sand, and now
it is
crumbling.
Nobody can
stop the
looming
disaster. Soon
it will be the
dawning of a
new day, a new
beginning, the
end to all the
misery and
suffering on
earth.
"Judgment also
will I lay to
the line, and
righteousness
to the
plummet: and
the hail shall
sweep away the
refuge of
lies, and the
waters shall
overflow the
hiding place."
" O
Timothy, keep
that which is
committed to
thy trust,
avoiding
profane and
vain
babblings, and
oppositions of
science
falsely so
called.
"
|
